<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAD Standards &#8211; Folder Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2009/06/cad-standards-folder-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2009/06/cad-standards-folder-notes/</link>
	<description>Practical, proven insight into CADD Management from Mark W. Kiker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:21:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sigouin</title>
		<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2009/06/cad-standards-folder-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-8128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sigouin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/?p=855#comment-8128</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Yes, I am talking about CAD files.

I completely agree with you. Moving files is inefficient and not needed.  Using relative pathing for xref&#039;s makes the transition from folder to folder slightly less complicated. It is still a whole process of work that I think is not required.

I find the danger of having several active files really impacts the flow of a project, especially when you have enlisted newer hires or junior staff to assist. The potential of working on the wrong files is too costly and time consuming. 

I am hoping that I can get a good explanation from them soon. So far, I am hearing the old &quot;This is how we have been doing it for 20 years and never learned anything else&quot; reasoning.

Thanks,

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Yes, I am talking about CAD files.</p>
<p>I completely agree with you. Moving files is inefficient and not needed.  Using relative pathing for xref&#8217;s makes the transition from folder to folder slightly less complicated. It is still a whole process of work that I think is not required.</p>
<p>I find the danger of having several active files really impacts the flow of a project, especially when you have enlisted newer hires or junior staff to assist. The potential of working on the wrong files is too costly and time consuming. </p>
<p>I am hoping that I can get a good explanation from them soon. So far, I am hearing the old &#8220;This is how we have been doing it for 20 years and never learned anything else&#8221; reasoning.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CADDManager</title>
		<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2009/06/cad-standards-folder-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-8124</link>
		<dc:creator>CADDManager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/?p=855#comment-8124</guid>
		<description>If you are talking about AutoCAD based files, then the reason for splitting them out is so multiple people can work on the files.  If the Sheet is part of the working file, then only one person can work on both.  By splitting them out you can distribute the work.  

I have seen small teams use &quot;bundled&quot; files, but I do not think it works for larger teams.  

I am not sure why they move the files from one folder to another.  I encourage never moving the files once XREFs are attached.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are talking about AutoCAD based files, then the reason for splitting them out is so multiple people can work on the files.  If the Sheet is part of the working file, then only one person can work on both.  By splitting them out you can distribute the work.  </p>
<p>I have seen small teams use &#8220;bundled&#8221; files, but I do not think it works for larger teams.  </p>
<p>I am not sure why they move the files from one folder to another.  I encourage never moving the files once XREFs are attached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sigouin</title>
		<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2009/06/cad-standards-folder-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-8121</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sigouin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/?p=855#comment-8121</guid>
		<description>Mark,

In your experience, how often have you seen a design team just use working drawings and not use sheets saved in another folder?

I am used to having working drawings and sheets in separate folders that can be archived easily.

The team that I am working with moves their working files to each issue folder and works on them as the project develops. The sheets are just the layout in each file. This seems very inefficient to me and I am just looking for your thoughts.

Thanks,

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>In your experience, how often have you seen a design team just use working drawings and not use sheets saved in another folder?</p>
<p>I am used to having working drawings and sheets in separate folders that can be archived easily.</p>
<p>The team that I am working with moves their working files to each issue folder and works on them as the project develops. The sheets are just the layout in each file. This seems very inefficient to me and I am just looking for your thoughts.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
