<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Useless CAD Standard &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2008/11/a-useless-cad-standard-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2008/11/a-useless-cad-standard-part-2/</link>
	<description>Practical, proven insight into CADD Management from Mark W. Kiker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:21:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2008/11/a-useless-cad-standard-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7997</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/?p=708#comment-7997</guid>
		<description>I like the part of having a process for enforcement.  A team of engineers and I are working on a plan to standardize the way standard parts (AN, NAS, and MS parts) are modeled in CAD, named, and located.  After reading this, I expanded the section on the implementation.  Hopefully all the typing, emailing, and meetings we&#039;ve done will not in vain.  As I read here, we should make the standard 99.9% complete but we&#039;ll need management backing to have it enforced.  We&#039;ll see.  I hope you keep writing and don&#039;t focus on the negative comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the part of having a process for enforcement.  A team of engineers and I are working on a plan to standardize the way standard parts (AN, NAS, and MS parts) are modeled in CAD, named, and located.  After reading this, I expanded the section on the implementation.  Hopefully all the typing, emailing, and meetings we&#8217;ve done will not in vain.  As I read here, we should make the standard 99.9% complete but we&#8217;ll need management backing to have it enforced.  We&#8217;ll see.  I hope you keep writing and don&#8217;t focus on the negative comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
