<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAD Standards &#8211; Almost Perfect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2007/01/cad-standards-almost-perfect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2007/01/cad-standards-almost-perfect/</link>
	<description>Practical, proven insight into CADD Management from Mark W. Kiker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2007/01/cad-standards-almost-perfect/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caddmanager.com/CMB/2007/01/03/cad-standards-almost-perfect/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Absolutely correct.  The second your procedure is published, it&#039;s outdated.  Someone will find something missing or incorrect.  Or take for example my recent case.  Our company merged with another, my procedure was revised not only in name but I also removed items that were covered at the corporate level.  Ten people reviewed it and everyone said it was fine.  Within a day I noticed that all of my references to the attachments were pointing to the old revision.  I revised the procedure two weeks later to fix the cross reference errors and guess what, I revised two things and added another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely correct.  The second your procedure is published, it&#8217;s outdated.  Someone will find something missing or incorrect.  Or take for example my recent case.  Our company merged with another, my procedure was revised not only in name but I also removed items that were covered at the corporate level.  Ten people reviewed it and everyone said it was fine.  Within a day I noticed that all of my references to the attachments were pointing to the old revision.  I revised the procedure two weeks later to fix the cross reference errors and guess what, I revised two things and added another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

